His point was whatever bike you have that gets you out on the road or trail is the right bike. He also mentioned that little tweaks can be made that improve the performance and longevity of your old bike. I couldn't agree more with both those statements, but there are definitely cases where someone has a bicycle that just isn't the right tool for the job.
I sometimes get accused of "bike shaming", but it usually involves someone who is just riding a really poor-quality (or poorly-maintained) machine, or quite simply, the wrong bike for the situation in which they are riding Yes, I love a sweet looking modern machine with high-end components, and I adore a classic steel European racing bike with elegant geometry and Campagnolo parts, but that isn't what everyone needs or should be pedaling.
Sure, I see plenty of folks who are "out for a bike ride", pedaling along on an old clunker, looking at the scenery, having a conversation with a friend, and that is fine. I'm talking about the folks who are out on their own, Lycra-clad, head down and obviously digging in for some exercise, but on a bulky machine that is slogging along the pavement.
It also drives me nuts to see a nice lightweight machine loaded down with a saddle bag, big cell phone mounts, etc. I have former customer who perplexes me with the "luggage" he regularly includes on his carbon fiber racing bike, completely outdoing the intent of its design!
Now why do I see folks riding the asphalt on a 30-year-old mountain bike with aero bars? Would they take a brand new, skinny-tired road bike out on a gravely, single-track, off-road route? Of course not, so why don't they see that they are not riding the correct machine for the terrain on which they are riding?
First of all, those knobby tires are just heavy and have too much rolling resistance. The least they can do is change out the fat rubber for some "slicks" that will roll easily over the tarmac!
Secondly, they've realized that the upright riding position is catching a lot of air, so they've (strangely) installed aero bars to get into more of a tuck. Why don't they just ride a bike with narrower, drop bars.
Of course, I know not everyone feels comfortable on drop bars, but that doesn't mean one has to ride "in the drops". I hardly EVER ride with my hands in the lower curve - I'm mainly on the top, short horizontal section of the bars, or on the brake lever hoods when climbing...and right there's another reason why drop bars are better, more hand positions. Also, modern compact handlebars are designed with a shallower drop than those in the past, which provide less of a crouch when riding in the optimum breaking position.
If someone isn't comfortable with narrow bars, different widths are available to get a cyclists' arms extended more in line with their shoulders. The key here is to flatten out the back a bit and bring the arms in to create less of an open, flat chest that would catch wind.
Finally, if you are saying to yourself, "Well, I like to ride on different surfaces, and that's why I have a mountain bike, for the wider tires," I'd follow up with the question, "Are you actually climbing mountains on some gnarly single-track, or just riding on some gravel trails?" Many models of drop-bar bikes have plenty of clearance for tires over 30 centimeters in diameter, which is more than enough width to handle rockier surfaces, and the rolling resistance that comes with tires this diameter when riding on asphalt isn't bad at all, so it's a nice compromise.
The really great thing about the marketing of the "gravel bikes" is that it allows people to really have one bike that does it all. Not everyone has the money to buy specialized bikes for different terrain or the space to store them, but now you can really just have one machine with a lot of flexibility. Even if you had a real preference for tires in certain situations, perhaps you could manage just having an extra set of wheels with which to easily swap out tire widths!
I've had several people bring bicycles in for me to repair or upgrade, and I've told them that the cost for the parts and work just aren't worth it, when compared to the performance they'd get from a newer bicycle. I'm not someone who wants to throw more trash in the landfill, but there is a point when a bike is just DONE and no amount of repair work is going to make that thing roll smoothly and shift correctly. Unless the frame has some collectability, there isn't a point in putting all new parts on an old frame.
This brings me to a beautiful bike I was working on the past couple of weeks. My brother had a friend's bike hanging in his garage, with the intent to ask me about the brand. Turned out the bike was a very nice Gios Torino, that had a flat bar setup. This is what I would call a "Cafe Racer", having a relaxed riding position but definitely with the pedigree to "do some damage" (in a good way) during a group ride.
During a friendly get-together, I told the owner about his great bike, some Gios history and the company's connection with the Belgian legend Roger de Vlaeminck. I also told him about my recent Colnago RdV project. Seeing my enthusiasm for the potential of his bike, he asked what should be done.
Well, despite the really nice set of wheels with Shimano 600 8-speed hubs, the rest of the group was at the lower end of the Shimano spectrum. The first thing I suggested was Campagnolo components, and then I noted that I could give the paint and chrome a little bit of touch-up and polish. It was important to him that the bike stay in its flat bar configuration, at least until he "got back into cycling" a bit more, and I replied "whatever gets you out on the road, using this great bike!"
I had a nice Campagnolo Chorus group and a companion set of wheels already in my shop stock, and I snagged a set of leather grips, plus a pair of silver brake levers that would match up better with the rest of the chrome. Unfortunately, his trigger shifters were toast, so I had to replace those, but the build would otherwise be fairly simple.
I knew ahead of time there would be compatibility issues between the Campagnolo rear derailleur and Shimano shift levers, so I was ready with a vintage Ultegra mech to be substituted. I had some fun with it, by polishing out the logo and applying a Campagnolo script decal on the derailleur face place, just to make it match up better with the rest of the "Campy" parts.
My friend Walt was visiting the other day in order to pick up his Pinarello Montello frameset to which I had recently applied decals and a headtube badge. He saw the setup on the Gios, and because he is a traditionalist, he scoffed a bit at the upright setup. I reiterated the importance of having someone comfortable with what he or she is riding and how I appreciate a customer's enthusiasm for riding a vintage bike, no matter what components are included
I'm not trying to convince people to go out and buy a new bicycle, since there are plenty of great used and affordable bicycles currently on the market, but is a great time to consider what you are riding and if it is giving you the kind of performance you desire. You can then decide if what you really want is to add a beautiful vintage machine with some history (hint, hint)!
